The public sphere was developed by Habermas and can broadly be defined
as “a social room which is created when individuals act communicatively” and a
place “where equal citizens assemble into a public and set their own agenda
through open communication” (Eriksen & Weigard, 2003, pp.178-179).
The public sphere is based upon freedom and allows citizens to discuss
and debate the general conditions for the common good (Eriksen & Weigard,
2003, pp.196). From an organizational perspective it serves to increase public
participation in the functioning of a company and thus empowers consumers and
the wider society.
There is a plethora of nutrition, health and fitness writers
in the blogosphere, talking about things from how to do a push up, to which
protein powder to add to your green smoothie recipe. While generally all these
types of blogs are based upon an individual’s opinion on how to get healthy,
they differ quite significantly blog to blog. This is a huge aspect of the
public sphere, an area where individuals can come to discuss.
The public sphere allows citizens to access freedom of information,
which is a “fundamental feature of a democratic society,” (Street, 2011, p.
327).
What I find most interesting about the abundance of
information these blogs have to offer is that they are coming from every corner
of the globe. The technical and original meaning of the public sphere was
literally a room where society came to converse, however with improvements of
technology has developed an innovative diversity to the term.
The blogosphere encapsulates the ideal behind the public
sphere, as it allows individuals to offer their ideas in an equal and
independent manner. According to Myers (2010) “blogs
broaden the terrain of public discussion, potentially allowing anyone with an Internet
connection to speak to a wider audience” (p. 273). The uses of colloquial
language in blogs also creates a sense of understanding and relate ability
amongst readers as Dettori & Torsani (2013) argue informal language
helps to enrich the learning process of individuals (p. 93).
REFERENCE:
Eriksen, EO & Weigard, J 2003, ‘Public opinion formation and
rational politics’, in Understanding
Habermas, communicative action and deliberative democracy, Continuum,
London, pp.178-196
Dettori, G, & Torsani, S 2013, 'Enriching Formal Language Learning with an
Informal Social Component', Journal Of Educational Technology &
Society, 16, 1, pp. 93-103, Academic Search Complete, EBSCOhost,
Myers, G 2010, 'Stance-taking
and public discussion in blogs', Critical Discourse Studies, 7, 4, pp.
263-275, Humanities Source, EBSCOhost
Street, J. (2011). Mass media, politics and democracy, 2nd ed. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.
303–328.
